Wednesday, November 3, 2004

Post election musings

On the electoral system

  The United States of America has got to come up with a better system of voting for the office of President. The current system is broken, and probably beyond repair. This is another example of progress not necessarily being a good thing. Hanging chads, crashed hard drives, ineligible absentee or provisional ballots, challengers at the polls, two to three hour waits at polling stations, these things should be embarrassing to all Americans.
  One of the biggest problems is the complexity of the ballot. There are so many things to vote for that electronic tabulation is the only feasible method of counting the ballots. In Columbus, Ohio, there were something like 34 different items on the ballot. No wonder there was a three hour wait at some polls. Even if you know exactly how you want to vote on each issue, it still takes three or four minutes just to make all of the selections. And for those who aren't quite sure of some of the issues, or even how to use the balloting equipment... Some poll workers said that the average voting time in Ohio was six to nine minutes. Given the number of polling booths available, and the average time to cast a single ballot, many polling stations were physically unable to process even fifty per cent of the people on their voters lists.
  We are talking about electing the President of the United States of America here, the most powerful man in the entire world. What is at stake, the world over, is far too important for these kinds of problems to be allowed to occur. Need to elect a new county sheriff, or dogcatcher? Need to vote on how funding for the local zoo will be collected? Want to decide whether or not to sell alcohol on a Sunday? Do it another day. Take all the little shit off the ballot. Here in Canada, when we hold a federal election, we are handed a paper ballot with the names of the candidates printed on it in extremely large type, and a big empty circle beside each name. We are given a fat black pencil and explicit instructions: "mark an "X" inside the circle beside one(1) name." That's it. No punch card machines or computer touchscreens. No levers to pull or buttons to press. Make your mark, fold your ballot, and place it in the box. Average time to cast a ballot: about 45 seconds. If we want to elect new city councillors, or new members of provincial parliament, or have a referendum on nationalsovereignty, we hold a different election for that.

On the outcome

   This election was the Democrats' to lose. For that matter, the last election was the Democrats' to lose. For George Bush to have won with barely 50% of the popular vote against John Kerry, or with less than 50% of the popular vote against Al Gore is very telling. All the Democrats had to do was actually field a strong candidate and the election was theirs. It's not going to get any easier. In 2008 Bush will no longer be allowed to run (unless he declares himself emperor) and the Democrats may have to face ::gasp:: Colin Powell. Has there been a bigger American Hero in the last 50 years? Better start thinking about it now. I don't know if Hillary will be good enough.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

thank you for your canadian input.

it's not broke. it's evolving. and it worked, regardless of who one backed.

Anonymous said...

I have got to comment on what you said about voting on dog catchers, zoo's, etc. I fully agree with you. We had to vote on new county coroner! I didn't even KNOW coroners were voted in!!!! Why can't those kind of things be covered in the Primary Elections in May, I believe it is? For the Presidential elections, all that should be there is the president/vice president, and our state and county officials. The IMPORTANT ones...not the freaking coroner!
And I agree on needing a new system. Ohio, my home state, is still using the old punch ballots. Oy vey is all I can say. (Though I am happy for the outcome of this election.)

Anonymous said...

My friend, Francois Vincent (who can't leave a comment because he doesn't have an AOL screen name!!) said this:

********************************************************************

There is no chance of Powell running for president. He made a promise to
his wife that he would never run. They both understand the very real
threat that he would be assassinated.

The Dems have Hilary but they also have Barack Obama.

Don't forget Florida Jeb is waiting in the weeds... Bush 44!

fv

PS: I'd post to your blog but I can't.

PPS: really, why are you using AOL?? didn't you do any research
beforehand? ;)

********************************************************************
Thanks for the comment, fv
-Paul

Anonymous said...

First time I checked out your journal.  When I voted yesterday, we had a paper ballot, much like you describe, but we also had sheriffs, and circuit court clerks, and senators and such too.  I agree with your suggestion.  But, though I would vote for Colin Powell in a minute, I don't believe he will ever run.  There are still too many racist idiots in our country for him to take that chance.  

Anonymous said...

Exciting.  I can harly wait for the 2008 race: Hillary/Bill VS Powell/Jeb Bush.

Anonymous said...

In Illinois we had that kind of ballot you mentioned the Canadian government uses, It had large print, circles and a black marker to fill in the circle. It has maybe 7 other offices that needed filling and maybe 2 referendums. I was in and out in under 3 minutes.
I think there needs to me a more uniform ballot, same one through out the country for every election so you can rely on familiarity.

Anonymous said...

Guess Hillary will be available, as rumor had it that a Dem Pres would have appointed her to Supreme Court or some crap like that. I can't stand her for some reason, I think it has to do with what she's willing to put up with just to continue climbing... there's a word for it, though she has put a different spin on it. I dunno. I HATED Bill so I guess members of his family get to ride in on that, TOO. ha ha

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure Powell will run either.  Although I'd vote for him if he did.  Perhaps McCain?  Hillary will be a strong candidate for the Dems.....time will tell if she's running for sure, and who the Republicans will pull out of their hat....

~JerseyGirl
http://journals.aol.com/cneinhorn/WonderGirl